In the last couple of days I had to revisit some Tracks to improve a config file for some edge case acceleration testing.
Files are having cycle slips and other problems but I managed to get them improved.
I use the Emlid Rinex logging and the latest demo5 RTKLIB library for this (need the CLI).
In addition I started testing the convbin from demo5 libraries and was wondering why getting sometimes very different numbers in the satellite lines.
I ran this demo5 convbin Rinex files and was able to eliminate nearly all problems with my files - just by switching from standard “emlid rinex” to “emlid ubx with conversion in demo5 convbin”. (CLI config file etc. is the same)
left is Emlid Rinex, Right is ubx to rinex
I am wondering now, if there is something weird with the conversion at some place (either emlid or demo5). But getting cleaner results in demo5 I am also wondering that there could be a possible improvement?
I always could do a convbin round in our script and use ubx, but maybe I can avoid that…
Files are from testing in March (Rinex emlid convbin 2.4.3), but the difference in files remains in files from today.
I am happy to share files via PM but config is heavily edited.