UBX conversion problem/testing/optimization?

Reach Module / M+ / M2 RTK / PPK configuration
24

Hi @goamberg,

I’ll test the data again to check the differences you mentioned.

I’ll let you know if I have any updates :slight_smile:

I’m curious. How do you use the data from Reach M2s in skiing?

25

@andrew.belov

It is sport analysis in general. Skiing is just because of getting close to winter :wink:
Custom housing and antenna mounts, along with some special software does the trick.
That is why I need my CLI :rofl: :rofl:

2 Likes
26

Hi @goamberg,

I have some findings to share. It took a while to come back to this thread, sorry for that!

According to the files you shared, raw data from the base unit doesn’t contain BeiDou and SBAS. However, if the UBX log is converted in PPK software, these GNSS are presented. I believe logging of the Beidou was accidentally disabled on the base unit.

Logging feature on receivers also doesn’t allow to record the data from SBAS satellites which are also used in calculation.

That is why you receive slightly different results between RINEX created on receivers and RINEX created in PPK software.

I haven’t find other reasons for inconsistency in results.

28

I checked that myself today…and oh man are you right.
Really sorry for that. At some point I didnt check the BeiDou Satellites.

Again. Sorry for this long thread for nothing… :cold_sweat:

29

We have all been there :smiley:

2 Likes
31

Hi @goamberg,

Happy New Year :slight_smile:

No worries! If you have any suspicions about the device’s performance, it’s a good thing to contact us and check the setup thoroughly.

Good luck with your projects!

33

This topic was automatically closed 100 days after the last reply. New replies are no longer allowed.