Hoping to get some information on the GNSS hardware differences between these units. They’re all using UBLOX GNSS recievers - are they using the same model, and if so is there anything different that would affect pure GNSS performance, ie antenna used or processing hardware?
1 Like
pretty sure all the same…except for the TILT function on the RS3…which enabled would result in less accuracy. Tradeoff for speed and the feature.
I would assume EMLID will jump in here.
2 Likes
That’s correct. They all use the Ublox ZED-F9P. The 2+ added LTE and dual antennas and the 3 add tilt compensation.
3 Likes
Hi @tomk ,
Performance-wise, they’re the same. The only major difference is that RS3 has a tilt and a built-in UHF radio.
RS2+ and RS3 support 4G, while RS2 works with 3G.
1 Like
Dual antennas?
Can you elaborate please?
1 Like
Think he meant the RS3? LoRa (send/receive) and UHF (receive only).
1 Like
Dual LTE antennas.
3 Likes
It would be nice to have an upgrade path from an RS2 to RS2+ by just swapping the sim slot so that LTE in the US works via SIM! Rather than buying a RS2+ of course.
1 Like
Here’s a comparison of the Reach RS3, RS2+, M2, and RX from Emlid, focusing on their key specifications: oops
editing…
Please dont copy paste from chatGPT. There are so many wrong statements in here.
In example. The RX is just as precise as the rest, also offering centimeter precise RTK.
Additionally, the RX is Bluetooth only, and does not have Wi-Fi.
4 Likes
Yeah… kill that post… totally inaccurate.
People can spot AI from a mile away anyways.
1 Like
Not to mention the M2 takes an external power source so there is no designated battery life, left out the RS2, the RX doesn’t use Wi-Fi and it forgot 3 constellations.
3 Likes
Google search is now serving an AI response as first on the list. At least typical search results are listed next. How long before AI is all you get. Dis Information is bad enough now… Just wait. 
5 Likes