I’m considering purchasing an RS2+ or RS3 but am unsure which is the better choice. The RS2+ is more affordable, and I believe it meets my needs, but I want to confirm before deciding.
I’ll be using the receiver with an NTRIP service to log photo locations. My workflow involves setting up a camera on a tripod and placing the receiver nearby to record positions. Accuracy within 10 cm is acceptable, so I don’t see the need for the RS3’s tilt correction. Based on Emlid Flow’s workflow, it seems I can log locations instantly, making the RS2+ a suitable option. Have I overlooked any key considerations?
If you don’t need tilt or an LTE modem then the RS2+ should do what you need. Have you looked at the RX? It is much smaller and lighter and could probably be mounted directly to your tripod. Even an M2 would do what you need and connected to a phone battery pack does all the same things. It would require the additional purchase of an antenna.
All our field-ready RTK units will fit your needs because they can receive corrections from NTRIP services. If your workflow is tailored to use NTRIP exclusively, I’d recommend Reach RX due to its form factor, lightweightness, and ease of use.
I’m curious about your workflow. Will you match and align the receiver’s location with the camera center? Or is it not needed in your case?
Hi Michael,
I just looked into the M2 and the M2 looks perfect for my needs. Thanks for highlighting that. My local survey store is selling the M2 and GNSS Antenna for $1640aud or the M+ with an older GNSS receiver for $520aud. I assume its worth paying extra for the newer model?
