what pole height do you recommend with an Emlid base and Tripod and Tribach?
I was thinking that if it is too high, it might become inaccurate since the tripod is always a little bit uneven (even with tribrach)…
What is your take on that?
Application is accurate survey mapping for construction and earth works…
2m is normal i would say. But any height to get the job done is ok if you do it right.
2 meter total or on top of a , let’s say 150cm tripod?
Obviously the higher, the more distance error caused by angular error.
So far so good.
I usually say it depends a lot on your surroundings. There are some questions one could ask before placing the base:
- does 1-2 meters more elevation help me get a better signal?
- by extending the pole 1-2 meters, will the receiver start to sway so much that the increase in sky-view is nulled by the imprecision caused by the swaying?
- if mounted on tribrach, can I find a suitable measuring point for instrument height? (expeically true when using extension rods)
- do I trust my extension rod+adapters to be perfectly straight?
In answering all these questions for my self, I find that for the RS2 I do the following:
- setup a tripod with the usual recommendations for when setting it up for a total station
- assemble RS2, 15 cm Emlid extension rod, 5/8" to 20 mm tribrach adapter and tribrach.
- put it on the tripod
- level and align tripod/tribrach
- measure height to bottom of the RS2
- add 0.134 meters (this usually totals an antenna-height of just under 2 meters)
- good to go.
This I use in most situations, but I also have 0.5 and 1 meter extension rods for use in heavily vegetated or build-up areas. However, I’d rather move my base than use the rods, if possible.
Thank you, that answers all my questions!
This topic was automatically closed 100 days after the last reply. New replies are no longer allowed.