Hi, I’m trying to get some values from Navio2 sensors.
While searching related information on Navio2 and it’s application, I found some questions on Navio2 hardware.
From the datasheet of Navio2, I found that Navio2 have MPU9250 & LSM9DS1 both.
As I searched, both (MPU9250 & LSM9DS1) have accelerometer, gyroscope, and magnetometer.
I want to know:
Why don’t use one of MPU9250 & LSM9DS1, instead of using both?
From example pages, they get mag. value from LSM9DS1 not from MPU9250. Why did they do?
(maybe the same question above)
From your comments, does it mean that Navio2 is designed to give a freedom on choosing chips for each sensors? I thought, providing 2 chips which have the same function leads to increase of cost. Is there any other reason?
And I heard that there’re some arguments on the reliability of getting mag. values from AK8963 (MPU9250).
Is this related to examples which use LSM9DS1 for magnetometer?
And some of my colleagues who are experienced on MPU9250 & Navio2 tell that it’s not sure where this unreliability is from.
Our team have developed an application with Navio2. They used LSM9DS1 for magnetometer. The developer’s failure note says, AK8963 generates values un-reliably and gets un-stable (fluctuating) values while the device is placed on top of the table.
You surely can use only LSM9DS1 in your application if it’s more suitable for you.
In regards to ArduPilot, it primarily uses the magnetometer measurements from LSM9DS1.