Doubts prior to purchase R + and M + ...?

[juanluischq (Juan Luis Chiri Quispe)]

Queries regarding the measurement with the DRON: EMLID REACH M +
1.- With the SONY RX0 camera, will it be that the cable they offer, that is, the shoe adapter, will be ideal for my camera …?
2.- It will be required that the REACH M + receiver and the antenna consume or connect to the battery. Because in my fixed-wing drone has its own battery for its connection in the flight controller.
3.- How much do the adapter for the camera, the M + receiver and the propeller antenna weigh? I suppose they carry during the flight …?
4.- They do not have a video in the armed, configured, unmanned plane launch and data processing; What will give me a general idea for its management.
5.- Attached images of my drone / UAV, with the question of whether your UAV PPK kit will be adaptable to my drone …?

Consultations regarding measurement with GPS: EMLID REACH RS +
1.- To the mention that you make that Emlid Reach RS + is terrible in capturing data in places with a difference of +/- 100 meters of obstacle interference of objects. For example, in my city of La Paz is constituted by an irregular topography of slopes covered by variable vegetation, construction and buildings of 50 floors. I thought that with product (Kit Reach +) I was going to give solutions in urban areas and I see that it only serves for flat land without buildings.
Any friend who has done data reliability tests (RMS) using RTK and PPK survey methods on irregular terrains on hillsides that contain saturation of urban areas …?

2.- With what programs do you use base line adjustment processing in order to obtain parameters of SCALE FACTOR …?

3.- When loading a list of points but in flat coordinates (UTM: EAST, NORTH, COTA) in Reach + as you rethink about it, there is no user manual for your application …?

4.- If xiomi Mi8 if already launched with GNSS frequencies L1, L2 and L5 and extremely economic. If they can not find out which card they use to clone successful experiences in EMLID REACH RS + …?

5.-There is the possibility of using UTM projection (EPSG: 32719) in Reach RS + and M +

Thanking you for your sincere answers, I remain in doubt in the purchase of the kit REACH +.

Atte, Juan Luis Chiri
juanluischq@gmail.com

[tobias-dahms]

I’m sorry, but I find it very hard to understand what you want to know. I would propose that you rewrite your questions in very short and less complex sentences.

[andrew.yushkevich]

Hi @juanluischq,

@juanluischq

1.- With the SONY RX0 camera, will it be that the cable they offer, that is, the shoe adapter, will be ideal for my camera …?

No, it’s not possible to connect RX0 with M+ with hot shoe adapter as RX0 doesn’t have the one.

@juanluischq

2.- It will be required that the REACH M + receiver and the antenna consume or connect to the battery. Because in my fixed-wing drone has its own battery for its connection in the flight controller.

You need to power M+ with an external battery (ex. powerbank) but you can also power it with your drone battery.

@juanluischq

3.- How much do the adapter for the camera, the M + receiver and the propeller antenna weigh? I suppose they carry during the flight …?

It’ll be around 80g.

@juanluischq

4.- They do not have a video in the armed, configured, unmanned plane launch and data processing; What will give me a general idea for its management.

@juanluischq

5.- Attached images of my drone / UAV, with the question of whether your UAV PPK kit will be adaptable to my drone …?

Can you clarify these questions, please?

@juanluischq

1.- To the mention that you make that Emlid Reach RS + is terrible in capturing data in places with a difference of +/- 100 meters of obstacle interference of objects. For example, in my city of La Paz is constituted by an irregular topography of slopes covered by variable vegetation, construction and buildings of 50 floors. I thought that with product (Kit Reach +) I was going to give solutions in urban areas and I see that it only serves for flat land without buildings.
Any friend who has done data reliability tests (RMS) using RTK and PPK survey methods on irregular terrains on hillsides that contain saturation of urban areas …?

You can find a lot of threads on this forum with the successful surveying results in difficult environmental conditions.

When the signal tracking L2 will be included in Reach RS + ...?

I don’t think there is anything on the market that comes within a bulls roar of the Emlids for <1000$ a piece, out of the box, ready to go, good user interface, functionality, and help. The Swift Navigation PKSI is just a KIT albeit a L1/L2 kit similarly priced to EMLID. BUT it’s a kit suited for developers and experimenters. If ever package similar to EMLID it will come at a price somewhat pricier than EMLID. However it would be putting EMLID on notice. I personally don’t subscribe to the muc…

@juanluischq

2.- With what programs do you use base line adjustment processing in order to obtain parameters of SCALE FACTOR …?

Can you clarify this questions, please?

@juanluischq

3.- When loading a list of points but in flat coordinates (UTM: EAST, NORTH, COTA) in Reach + as you rethink about it, there is no user manual for your application …?

@juanluischq

5.-There is the possibility of using UTM projection (EPSG: 32719) in Reach RS + and M +

You can’t load points in UTM on the device and use EPSG32719, as Reach can only handle with the WGS84 system at the moment.

[juanluischq (Juan Luis Chiri Quispe)]

@andrew.yushkevich

estaría poniendo EMLID en aviso. Yo personalmente no me suscribo a la muc …

That last one ruined me, we usually work in UTM system. Thanks for your clarification.