Difference between Reach RS base and NTRIP correction

[wittich (Valentin)]

@TB_RTK

I would rather do static process with Reachbase and IGS, and then PPK Reach with rover,that would give you the most accurate measure i think.

That’s what I thought I have to do, though I still don’t know exactly the processes… Let’s see if I can figure it out by my self.

@TB_RTK

Other then that you could maybe process the result a bit better from IGS and tweek it to line up more, but dont think it will line up perfectly.

But that only makes sense, if I can improve and verify the Reachbase position, right?

@TB_RTK

Other then that, VRS is an option maybe ?

I have to admit that I hat firs to read about it (by the way thx for the hints), before I know what you mean. For now it’s only about PPK as I’m back in Europe, also the there is not something like a good GNSS network there (s. fig).

@TB_RTK

You could do a test. If you drove the same route, but stoped and did static measure for few minutes and repeated this few places around the track, and then processed those static points with Reach base vs IGS base, i am pretty sure the resulte would suprise you. Static handles long baseline better then kinematic.

I have a track from another day where I measure some GCP that should work for a test. Can you give me some more hints about the procedure? I’ve never got that munch into the detail of PPK…