Combine L1/L2 Base and L1 Rover for an NTRIP solution

I have a Topcon Legacy (L1/L2) set up as a network base in my office, is it possible for my reach unit (L1 only) to receive and use corrections from the base?

Yes that is possible. Reach will just only use the L1 data of the RTCM data stream.

1 Like

Will it work the other way? L1 base sending corections to L1/L2 rover? What about accuracy?

I guess it works aswell. Depends on the RTK algorithms the Topcon is using but that’s just guessing. Don’t know if a L1/L2 GNSS Receiver will refuse to compute solutions with L1 only.

Which one to use as rover depends on the environment of the base location and the location where the rover will be surveying. My guess is, that the Topcon has got a better antenna than the Tallysman of the Reach so it can handle multipath and bad signal environments better. So if the base is unobstructed I’d set Reach up as base and take the Topcon out as rover.

As for accuracy there shouldn’t be much difference between Reach as base and Topcon as rover or the other way round. Even the accuracy with L1 only is kinda the same as L1/L2 or even L1/L2/L5 as long as you have unobstructed areas and short baselines.

That’s my understanding of the theory and haven’t tested it. I have tested Reach with a Topcon GR3 as base but didn’t try the other way round.
Maybe someone else can share his 2 cents and either support my view of things or tells a different story :wink:

1 Like

Thank you!

I have another question. When connecting both my reach units to my L1/L2 base, I connect successfully, yet I’m not seeing any gray bars showing the Bases individual Satellite signal strength. I do see, in the upper right corner of reachview, two red boxes indicating the number of Rover and base Satellites.

Ant ideas?

Please provide more information. A system report on Reach and incoming RTCM messages(available on the Correction Input screen).

I checked nmea checkbox, this is the error:

[FBLS]: 1st NMEA-183 Sentence Detected from Client #C005 ‘mwfoshee’: NMEA inputs are ignored for this user.
[FBLS]: Was: [$GPGGA,224008.31,3429.5638246,N,09300.9311692,W,1,10,1.0,131.446,M,-28.836,M,0.0,*78 ]

Working on screenshots

@egor.fedorov, Sorry for the delay, why no grey bars?

Here is a screenshot of the correction input screen, I don’t see a system report of any kind, what am I missing?

password is 1702 if you want to try yourself

is anyone from @emlid watching this.

In the above screenshot, it says “connected to …”

Did no more lines show up at the bottom in green? What about after refreshing the screen after waiting a minute? The RTCM message types received from your base should be listed there. That is what Egor was wanting to know.

Your system report is available in the ReachView settings. You can read about it in the docs:

https://docs.emlid.com/reachrs/common/reachview/settings/#system-report

I’ve left it up for more than an hour, No grey bars (first screenshot) ever and on the second screenshot, the only line was “connected to …”, even after refresh and waiting

I’ll read the docs in the link above and post later.

Thanks @bide

Simple Report:

[details=“Simple system report”]

app version: 2.10.3-dev-r0
'wifi_status, interface: wlan0':
- Client state
- IP address: 10.0.1.101
  mac address: 90:b6:86:02:09:38
  ssid: HSCS
base mode:
  base coordinates:
    accumulation: '0.1'
    antenna offset:
      east: '0'
      north: '0'
      up: '0'
    coordinates:
    - '34.293323727'
    - '-93.005561567'
    - '136.31'
    format: llh
    mode: manual
  output:
    enabled: false
    format: rtcm3
    path: tcpsvr://:9000#rtcm3
    type: tcpsvr
  rtcm3 messages:
    '1002':
      enabled: true
      frequency: '10'
    '1006':
      enabled: true
      frequency: '10'
    '1008':
      enabled: true
      frequency: '10'
    '1010':
      enabled: true
      frequency: '10'
    '1019':
      enabled: true
      frequency: '10'
    '1020':
      enabled: true
      frequency: '10'
    '1097':
      enabled: false
      frequency: '1'
    '1107':
      enabled: true
      frequency: '10'
    '1117':
      enabled: false
      frequency: '10'
    '1127':
      enabled: false
      frequency: '10'
bluetooth:
  discoverable: true
  enabled: true
  pin: '***'
camera:
  duty cycle: 20
  enable: false
  period: 2
  polarity: true
correction input:
  input2:
    enabled: true
    format: rtcm2
    path: FBRover:***@206.255.248.85:5000/FBLS
    send position to base: single
    type: ntripcli
  input3:
    enabled: false
    format: rtcm3
    path: :9028
    type: tcpsvr
logging:
  base:
    format: RTCM3
    started: true
    version: null
  correction:
    format: RTCM3
    started: true
    version: null
  interval: 86400
  overwrite: true
  raw:
    format: UBX
    started: true
    version: null
  solution:
    format: ERB
    started: true
    version: null
position output:
  output1:
    enabled: true
    format: erb
    path: ttyMFD2:57600:8:n:1:off
    type: serial
  output2:
    enabled: false
    format: llh
    path: :2013
    type: tcpsvr
  output3:
    enabled: true
    format: llh
    path: :2014
    type: tcpsvr
  output4:
    enabled: true
    format: llh
    path: :2015
    type: tcpsvr
rtk settings:
  elevation mask angle: '15'
  glonass ar mode: 'off'
  gps ar mode: fix-and-hold
  max horizontal acceleration: '1'
  max vertical acceleration: '1'
  positioning mode: kinematic
  positioning systems:
    compass: false
    galileo: false
    glonass: true
    gps: true
    qzs: true
    qzss: false
    sbas: false
  snr mask: '35'
  update rate: '5'

[/details]SystemReport.zip (70.8 KB)


Bottom showing base and rover on map:

Hi Mike,

Could you try to send the corrections using RTCM3?

my older base doesn’t support RTCM3

@TB_RTK would you mind looking this over?

Hi,
Seems like an old system and the only message i got was rtcm2 nr 18 and 19
A retired message system.
Also the VRS didnt let med get a refrence close enough, i got like 6453km baseline, no good.
Have you tried save logs and process them on the computer with RTKlib?
You might get lucky converting them into something usefull. Other then that it seems not usable unless the Reach supports older rtcm messages.

2 Likes