Hello @EBE111057
Thanks.
I tried to do my best.
1 Like
@wizprod
I hadn’t thought of that either.
I’m studying some system improvements.
Like installing a UPS, maybe a cooling box.
And I’ll think about how to distance it from the socket and the wifi router.
Thanks for the tip.
I realize that in this sort of thing we never come to an end.
There will always be things to improve. 
1 Like
The setup looks nice 
Which antenna do you use here?
I agree with Christian - it’s better to move Reach M2 away from cables and Wi-Fi antennas. Even if they are located not near the GNSS antenna but near the receiver itself, it can influence the results.
I think the IBGE database only allows for Rinex data.
Oh, that’s what I’ve actually meant! Sorry if my message was confusing. The raw data log from the base should be in the RINEX format, not RTCM3. It would be interesting to check it. Also, I’ll be curious to see the new test results!
1 Like
Hi @mauricioranzan,
Looks good! I just wanted to learn which antenna it is out of curiosity, but I can comment on the specs as well 
As I see, the antenna supports all GPS, GLONASS, Galileo, and BeiDou signals that Reach M2 can track, and its output current is less than 50 mA. If the DC bias is no more than 3.3 V (I didn’t find this characteristic in the list), it suits all the Reach M2 requirements.
This topic was automatically closed 100 days after the last reply. New replies are no longer allowed.